Hem SAQ Forum SAQ Transmissions SAQ Receiver Gallery

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #4074 Reply
    Juergen Brustat
    Participant

    Would you dare driving an old-timer ralley with a modern Formula-1 racing car ?
    Certainly not !
    Receiving an old-time transmitter with a soundcard and a PC or an SDR
    is as well improper style or even bad taste, but in no way a remarkable achievement.
    Everybody can do so !
    In my eyes the only proper way to receive SAQ is using an old-time receiver,
    the older the better. Not necessarily an original receiver of the twenties
    – who is lucky to own one ? – but any non-digital hardware receiver
    – original or reconstructed, industrial or home-built – might be ok.

    To encourage listeners and demonstrate what can be done,
    I recommend installing an SAQ RECEIVER GALLERY in this forum,
    where every successful listener may describe his equipment,
    preferably with a photo or perhaps schematic diagram.
    No.1 will certainly be Jim Moritz with his ingenious electromechanical receiver,
    but I am convinced there will be many other units
    from the twenties to nowadays.

Viewing 5 reply threads
  • Author
    Replies
    • #11072 Reply
      rich.g.williams
      Participant

      “Would you dare driving an old-timer ralley with a modern Formula-1 racing car ? Certainly not !
      Receiving an old-time transmitter with a soundcard and a PC or an SDR is as well improper style or even bad taste, but in no way a remarkable achievement.
      Everybody can do so !”

      This is a very unfair comment I say this for the following reasons:

      – The original Kungsbacka Receiver Station, it is noted that the Receiver antenna “consisted of two copper wires set up on 9 m tall telephone poles along a stretch of about 13.4 km, over Kungsbackaån and southeast out through Hanhals and Fjärås parishes to Skärsjön on the south side of Lygnern” So how many of us have access to such a 13.4 km length antenna.

      – I want to receive SAQ transmission in Cardiff Wales UK and my garden allows for a 25 metre wire antenna so must use “every trick in the book” to receive SAQ with certainty at good signal strength.
      – To build a simple tuned receiver modern electronics is easiest and to avoid need for hardware BFO etc its easy to record the 17200 Hz carrier directly using a Laptop PC (at 48 k samples/sec) and use software to detect the Morse code.

      My belief is that the SAQ transmission propagates around the globe so for people trying to receive in the opposite hemisphere use of modern electronics and software processing is essential.

      Also to be perfectly honest I have looked at some of the old receiver designs and to me they look very bloated, over complicated, difficult to understand and difficult to build – they do not follow the most important designers commandment which is “keep it simple”

      I agree that existing receivers built originally should be looked after and kept safe but I do not agree that people should be encouraged to rebuild those old designs in the 21st Century.

    • #11023 Reply
      Tonny
      Guest

      Old post, but still:

      https://www.verhoef.se/index.php?menu=myphscr/album.php&name=album/hobby/saq

      just finished, ready for upcoming transmission

    • #5260 Reply
      Martin Mehlhose
      Participant

      actually I am restorating this great old Telefunken E108Lw4

      http://www.wellenkino.de/e108/1.jpg

      http://www.wellenkino.de/e108/11.jpg

      http://www.wellenkino.de/e108/13.jpg

      the first band of this very glowing radio is 10 to 31kHz.

      greetings from germany
      Martin

    • #5182 Reply
      F6AGR
      Participant

      Hi Jürgen

      This has been done a long time ago by M0BMU.
      Have a look on http://www.wireless.org.uk/mechrx.htm

      Cheers

      Jean-Louis F6AGR

    • #5074 Reply
      Petr, OK1RP
      Guest

      Hi all,
      where is the gallery please?
      73 – Petr, OK1RP

    • #4080 Reply
      Juergen Brustat DL2JMB
      Guest

      Maybe I was a bit narrow-minded in limiting the presentation in the SAQ RECEIVER GALLERY
      to hardware receivers. The receiver is only part of the equipment and
      antenna, recorder, any evaluation gear, even the power supply, they all are important too.
      Anybody who has a new idea in software equipment should be equally welcome.
      Even having had no reception might be interesting in order to teach others how to do it better.

      I am convinced that within a very short time there will be many, many contributions to the gallery
      from all over the world. I myself own about a dozen sets usable for SAQ reception,
      ranging from 27 tube LF receiver Collins R-389 over level meters to home-built regens.
      Each time SAQ is active, I try another equipment and I would like to describe them all with features,
      advantages and disadvantages.
      So, friends of SAQ, wherever you may be, follow me ! DL2JMB Juergen Brustat

Viewing 5 reply threads
Reply To: SAQ Receiver Gallery
Your information:




Subscribe!

Be the first to know about upcoming SAQ transmissions by subscribing to our newsletter.

No, thanks!